Ordinations of Dominicans and Capuchins: A Closer Look at Rome's Doctrinal Discussions with the SSPX

This is the first in a series of interviews conducted by John Vennari, Editor of Catholic Family News, with Father Arnaud Rostand, the District Superior of the Society of St. Pius X in the United States, focusing on the doctrinal discussions between Rome and the Society.

Understanding the Need for Discretion in Dialogues with Rome

According to Father Rostand, these discussions are being held privately, which has been a mutual decision from both Rome and the Society. The privacy of this dialogue serves to prevent undue external pressure that can influence the discussions, following a practice not uncommon in the Church's history.

The Initial Context of the Discussions

The lifting of the excommunications of the bishops consecrated by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre coincided with intense media scrutiny, heightening the need for a confidential environment to foster an open and honest theological exchange.

Precedents of Secrecy in Church Proceedings

In the Church's tradition, many conversations, including those surrounding the election of a Pope, are conducted in secret to maintain objectivity and respect for ecclesiastical authority. Transparency is expected post-discussion.

The Current State and Nature of Doctrinal Discussions

While confidentiality limits what can be shared, the essence of these discussions revolves around the compatibility of Vatican II's teachings with the traditional doctrine of the Church, which remains unchanged from the Society's perspective.

Public Positions and Known Facts

Despite the confidential nature of the discussions, the positions of the SSPX and Rome are well known. The former remains resolute in challenging certain aspects of Vatican II while Rome maintains the council's continuity with longstanding Church tradition.

The Impact of Secrecy and Documentation

Comprehensive records, including audio and video recordings of the discussions, are kept to ensure that all the deliberations can be reviewed by higher authorities within the Church upon conclusion.

The Unintended Consequences of the Discussions

One unexpected outcome of the discussions is a renewed interest in the works of Archbishop Lefebvre. Additionally, an increasing number of diocesan priests are seeking doctrinal guidance from the SSPX, demonstrating a desire for traditional teaching.

Addressing the Root Causes: The Council Itself or Its Interpretation?

Differing viewpoints exist between the SSPX and Pope Benedict XVI on the source of the crisis within the Church. While the SSPX identifies the council itself as problematic, the Pope and others in Rome consider its interpretations to be the cause of troubles within the Church.

Efforts to Rehabilitate Vatican II

Rome's attempts to clarify, revise, or negate problematic practices post-Vatican II are seen as not tackling the root principles endorsed by the Council that the SSPX believes are at the heart of the crisis.

Specific Instances of Council-Originated Issues

Clarifications on the nature of the Mass, religious liberty, ecumenism, and Church hierarchy introduced by Vatican II have had a profound impact on the Church's practices and identity, causing long-lasting and far-reaching effects.

The Case of the Eucharist

The redefinition of the Mass from a sacrificial offering to a community-centered celebration is one of the significant changes brought about by the council that challenges traditional teachings.

Liturgical Authority and Experimentation

The empowerment of bishops' conferences to influence liturgical practices post-Vatican II has resulted in widespread diversity in worship, further compounding the issues faced by the Church.

Understanding the Role of the Priest

Shifts in the definitions of priesthood brought about by the Council have diluted the distinction between priests and the laity, as well as altered the relationship between priests and bishops.

Anticipating the End of Discussions

Bishop de Galarreta of the SSPX expressed a desire not to prolong the doctrinal discussions indefinitely. The goal is to assert traditional teachings and document the Society's positions, rather than engage in endless debate.

From Doctrinal Debates to Pilgrimage Destinations

The dialogues have underscored the importance of roots, whether in our faith or in our travel. As we consider the unfolding doctrinal deliberations, we're reminded that journeys, be they spiritual pilgrimages or doctrinal explorations, are about returning to the foundation of our beliefs. Just as pilgrims travel to sacred shrines to reconnect with their faith, the discussions between the SSPX and Rome serve to clarify and return to the bedrock of Church teachings.